The second article (Thompson & Saunders, 2019b) discussed the period 1838 to 1900. For men and women who had been enslaved, any expectation that as full Emancipation dawned in 1838, their former masters would wish them well swiftly lost credence. Instead, a tiny circle of people who were at once merchants and landholders refused to place the means of security, and eventual prosperity, within reach of the general population and chose instead to manufacture hardship for the great majority where none need have existed.
They lodged an assault on Africans or their descendants and since so large a proportion of the African or African-descended population was vulnerable to being exploited, but in truth their assault was even more comprehensive in scope. They lodged an assault on a social and economic class – on those who, regardless of their race or their gender, lacked advantage and influence – since women and men who were white, as well as women and men who were black, faced their abuse. For those within that social and economic class who had earlier been enslaved and now were technically free, therefore, manufactured limits continued to hobble their lives after 1838 just as they had done before.